1. Resources
  2. ›
  3. Guides
  4. ›
  5. Methods & models
GUIDE Market Research

MaxDiff: what it is and how to use it

When every item on a rating scale scores 4 or 5, nothing stands out as a priority. MaxDiff asks customers to choose instead of rate, and shows not only what matters but how much more it matters than everything else.

Cloud4Feed Research Team ·Updated 22 Oct 2026 ·8 min read
Quick answer

MaxDiff (Maximum Difference Scaling) shows people small sets of 4–5 items and asks which is most and which is least important. Repeated across many sets, these choices place every item on one common scale.

MostWhich matters most and least to you?Least
Delivery speed
✓Reliability
Price transparency−
Support quality
One MaxDiff task. A study repeats this with different combinations of items.
Count score = (Times chosen most − Times chosen least) ÷ Times shownTry the calculator ↓

At a glance

Task
Pick the most and least important item in each set
Items per set
4–5
Items in a study
Typically 8 to 30
Output
Utility scores and preference shares
Best for
Prioritising features, needs or improvements
IN THIS GUIDE
  • What is MaxDiff?
  • How MaxDiff works
  • MaxDiff count calculator
  • Rating scales vs MaxDiff
  • When to use MaxDiff, and when not to
  • How to design a MaxDiff study
  • How to read MaxDiff results
  • How to act on MaxDiff results
  • MaxDiff FAQ

What is MaxDiff?

MaxDiff, short for Maximum Difference Scaling and also called best–worst scaling, is a survey method for finding out what matters most to people. Instead of rating each item on its own, respondents see small sets of four or five items, all of them reasonable, and pick the most important and the least important one in each set. They cannot say “I want them all”.

The method was developed by Jordan Louviere in the late 1980s and first published in 1992. It is widely used in market research because it fixes a common problem with rating scales: when customers rate items one by one, most items land between 4 and 5, and the list no longer shows a priority. People do not judge options in isolation; they compare them. MaxDiff measures exactly that comparison.

How MaxDiff works

  1. 1Design the experiment. A balanced design, usually based on a balanced incomplete block design (BIBD), places every item in many different sets so each item appears about equally often and competes with every other item.
  2. 2Collect the choices. Each respondent completes a series of sets, choosing the most and least important item in each.
  3. 3Model the choices. A choice model, multinomial logit (MNL) for the total sample or Hierarchical Bayes (HB) for each respondent, estimates how likely each item is to be chosen over the others.
  4. 4Report utilities and shares. The model gives each item a utility score on a common scale, often converted into preference shares that add up to 100.

Count score = (Times chosen most − Times chosen least) ÷ Times shown

The count score is a quick first look at the data and ranges from −1 to +1. Final results come from the choice model in step 3.

Worked example200 respondents, 8 items, 4 items per set, 6 sets each. Every item is shown 3 times to each respondent: 600 times in total.Reliability was chosen as most important 300 times and least important 30 times.Count score = (300 − 30) ÷ 600 = 0.45Loyalty rewards, chosen most 20 times and least 350 times, scores (20 − 350) ÷ 600 = −0.55. The full example is in the calculator.

MaxDiff count calculator

Enter each item with how often it was shown, chosen as most important and chosen as least important. The ranking updates as you type.

Rating scales vs MaxDiff

Rating scales ask how good or important each item is on its own. MaxDiff asks which item wins when items compete. The difference shows up in how clear the result is.

Aspect1–5 rating scaleMaxDiff
Question typeRate each item on its ownChoose between items in a set
Typical resultScores bunch together, often 4.2–4.8Clear gaps between items
Scale useRespondents use the scale differently (some rate everything high)No scale to interpret, so no scale-use bias
Measurement levelOrdinal: the order of scores, not true distancesInterval utilities; preference shares can be read as ratios
PriorityEverything looks importantOnly the critical items stand out
Question it answers“Is this important?”“How much more important is this than that?”

When to use MaxDiff, and when not to

Use MaxDiff when you want to…
  • choose between many features, needs, messages or improvements
  • build a roadmap when budget and time are limited
  • find out how priorities differ between customer segments
  • replace an importance grid where every item scored 4 or 5
Choose another method when you need to…
  • track loyalty over time: NPS
  • rate one specific experience: CSAT
  • measure how easy a task was: CES
  • track employee loyalty: eNPS
MaxDiff is a research study, not a continuous metric: run it when you need to set priorities, then track the results with NPS, CSAT or CES.

How to design a MaxDiff study

Standard MaxDiff question

Which of these is MOST important to you when choosing a [category] provider, and which is LEAST important?

MostWhich matters most and least to you?Least
Price transparency
Easy returns−
✓Delivery speed
App ease of use
Support quality

Write clear, comparable items

Each item should describe one idea, at the same level of detail as the others, in plain words customers use. Avoid items that overlap (“fast delivery” and “quick shipping”) or that bundle two things (“fast and cheap delivery”).

Size the exercise

Most studies use 8 to 30 items with 4 or 5 items per set. Aim to show each item at least three times to every respondent. A quick way to estimate the number of sets: three times the number of items, divided by the items per set. With 20 items and 5 per set, that is 12 sets.

Plan the segments in advance

Decide before fieldwork which groups you want to compare, such as customer type, region or value tier, and make sure each group has enough respondents to report on its own.

Tip: add one open question after the MaxDiff tasks, such as “Is anything important to you missing from this list?”. It catches items you did not think to test.

How to read MaxDiff results

Utility scores are the model’s raw output. They are usually centred on zero, so positive items are above average and negative items below. Differences between utilities are meaningful, so you can say how far apart two items are.

Preference shares convert utilities into the probability of each item being chosen, scaled so that all items add up to 100. They can be read as ratios: an item with a share of 20 is twice as important as an item with a share of 10. This is the version most teams present.

Segment results come from Hierarchical Bayes, which estimates scores for every respondent. The same product can be judged by very different values: one segment may put speed first, another reliability, another price transparency. That is where measurement turns into design.

Like every survey method, MaxDiff is only as good as its items and sample. Check that the items you care about were in the list, and that the respondents represent the customers you want to serve.

How to act on MaxDiff results

Decide what you will not do

The real value of MaxDiff is that it tells you what to leave out. Items at the bottom of the ranking are the work you can deliberately stop or postpone, so resources go to the few things that move customers. A roadmap is a strategy only when it also says no.

Combine importance with performance

MaxDiff shows what matters; CSAT, CES or item-level ratings show how well you deliver it. Put the two together and start where importance is high and performance is low.

Design by segment

When segments disagree, one average priority list serves nobody well. Use the segment results to tailor journeys, messages and service levels to what each group values most.

MaxDiff FAQ

No. A full ranking of 20 items is tiring, and the middle of the list is usually guesswork. MaxDiff asks for only the two easiest judgements in each small set, best and worst, and a statistical model turns them into a complete order with distances between items.

Conjoint shows complete product profiles built from attribute levels (for example price, brand and delivery time) and estimates trade-offs between those levels. MaxDiff ranks a list of separate items. Use MaxDiff to prioritise a list, conjoint to design an offer.

Not on its own. Standard MaxDiff is relative: it shows which items matter more than others, even if none of them matters much. Anchored MaxDiff adds a short follow-up question that sets a threshold, so you can also see which items are important in absolute terms.

Count scores are a quick, transparent check and usually give the same overall order. For final results, segment analysis and preference shares, use a choice model: multinomial logit (MNL) for the total sample, or Hierarchical Bayes (HB) for scores per respondent.

It depends on the number of items and on the segments you want to compare. A few hundred respondents usually give stable total results; plan for at least 100 or more in each segment you want to report separately.

HOW CLOUD4FEED HELPS

Surveys

Ask the right question, to the right person — in minutes.

Explore the module →

Cloud4Feed Research Team

Our research, analytics and CX team writes about what we learn running feedback programmes across 15+ industries.

About us →
Market Research

More measurement guides

See all guides →

Relational NPS

RELATIONAL VS TRANSACTIONAL NPS Read the guide →

SEM

STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELLING Read the guide →

Mystery shopping

SERVICE STANDARDS AUDIT Read the guide →

From the blog

See all articles →
BLOG
Measurement & VoC

When VoC Data Puts Two Roads in Front of You

Fix the weak spots or grow the strengths? How VoC data shows which weaknesses are truly critical and which strengths are worth owning.

Cloud4Feed Research Team · 4 Jun 2026 · 1 min read
BLOG
AI & Analytics

Where the Data Falls Silent

AI reads what customers do faster than ever. Why they do it still lives in emotion and context, and closing that gap is the work of insight.

Cenk Onur Ozan · 20 Oct 2026 · 4 min read
BLOG
Customer Experience

Turning Customer Feedback Into Product Decisions

How product teams can collect product signals from surveys, reviews and calls, rank them by impact, validate them with a short study and close the loop.

Cloud4Feed Research Team · Updated 22 Oct 2026 · 3 min read

Ready to put this into practice?

A 30-minute walkthrough set up for your industry and your team.

Request a Demo → Talk to sales
↺Loop closed
Case resolved by the team
Case #4821 opened · Ops · SLA 48hLoop closed ✓
Installation scheduling — +2.1 NPS if fixed
Cloud4Feed
See full platform overview →
FEEDBACK SOURCES
Surveys Reputation Management & Social Listening Call Quality Monitoring Product & Competitive Intelligence
AI-POWERED ENGAGEMENT
WhatsApp Conversational Interviews Voice AI Telephony Interviews ReActivate — Smart Retention Management
INTELLIGENCE & ANALYTICS
Conversation & Text Intelligence AI Insights & Predictive Analytics
See all solutions →
SOLUTION AREAS
Customer Experience Employee Experience Market Research
BY INDUSTRY
Retail & E-Commerce Hospitality & Travel Finance & Insurance Automotive Telecom Healthcare Utilities Public Sector
BY DEPARTMENT
Marketing Customer Experience Department Customer Services HR Product Management Market Research
Customers
Resources
BlogIdeas and practice in CX, EX and research.→GuidesHow to measure and act on NPS, CSAT, CES and more.→Reports & E-booksOriginal research, free to read.→
Customer stories →Browse all resources →
Pricing
Why Cloud4FeedOne platform instead of five point tools. About UsWho we are and what we believe. PartnershipResell, implement or integrate Cloud4Feed. ContactTalk to sales, support or our team.
Request a Demo
See full platform overview →
FEEDBACK SOURCES
Surveys Reputation Management & Social Listening Call Quality Monitoring Product & Competitive Intelligence
AI-POWERED ENGAGEMENT
WhatsApp Conversational Interviews Voice AI Telephony Interviews ReActivate — Smart Retention Management
INTELLIGENCE & ANALYTICS
Conversation & Text Intelligence AI Insights & Predictive Analytics
See all solutions →
SOLUTION AREAS
Customer Experience Employee Experience Market Research
BY INDUSTRY
Retail & E-Commerce Hospitality & Travel Finance & Insurance Automotive Telecom Healthcare Utilities Public Sector
BY DEPARTMENT
Marketing Customer Experience Department Customer Services HR Product Management Market Research
Customers
Resources
BlogGuidesReports & E-books
Customer stories →Browse all resources →
Pricing
Why Cloud4FeedOne platform instead of five point tools. About UsWho we are and what we believe. PartnershipResell, implement or integrate Cloud4Feed. ContactTalk to sales, support or our team.
Request a Demo
Ranked by count score Count score = (Most − Least) ÷ Shown
1Reliability0.45
Most 300 · Least 30 · Shown 600
2Delivery speed0.33
Most 250 · Least 50 · Shown 600
3Price transparency0.25
Most 220 · Least 70 · Shown 600
4Support quality0.10
Most 160 · Least 100 · Shown 600
5Easy returns−0.03
Most 120 · Least 140 · Shown 600
6App ease of use−0.20
Most 80 · Least 200 · Shown 600
7Store experience−0.35
Most 50 · Least 260 · Shown 600
8Loyalty rewards−0.55
Most 20 · Least 350 · Shown 600
Importance (MaxDiff) →
Fix first High importance, low performance
Protect High importance, high performance
Deprioritise Low importance, low performance
Do not over-invest Low importance, high performance
LowHigh
Current performance (CSAT, CES or ratings) →
Share

New guides and research, once a month.

No sales emails. Unsubscribe anytime.

We use your details to respond to your request. See our Privacy Policy.

Cloud4Feed

Insights. Connect. Growth.

hello@cloud4feed.com Istanbul, Türkiye

Platform

Platform Overview Surveys Reputation Management & Social Listening Call Quality Monitoring Product & Competitive Intelligence WhatsApp Conversational Interviews Voice AI Telephony Interviews ReActivate — Smart Retention Management Conversation & Text Intelligence AI Insights & Predictive Analytics

Solutions

Customer Experience Employee Experience Market Research Retail & E-Commerce Hospitality & Travel Finance & Insurance Automotive Telecom Healthcare Utilities Public Sector

Teams

Marketing Customer Experience Customer Service HR Product Management

Resources

Blog Guides Reports & E-books Customers

Company

Why Cloud4Feed About Us Partnership Contact Pricing
© 2026 Acsight İş Çözümleri Araştırma ve Danışmanlık A.Ş. All rights reserved.
Request a Demo Privacy Policy Terms of Service Cookie Policy